Well, sort of. I don't know if this will fix the WUSB300N as I returned the two I had earlier this week because of their complete uselessness. However, I have solved my N network NIC problem, and share this here to help others with their WUSB300N. This is long, but a worthwhile read -- you might be able to get your WUSB300N working properly (or, dump it and get a D-Link DWA-142).
First, my setup: Replaced my entire network with a Linksys N-based network a few weeks ago. WRT300N router, two WUSB300N client adapters for the two wireless PCs. Nothing but trouble since day one, same things as others here.
After dozens of hours working on this, researching on the net, etc., I have the answer to the problems.
The WUSB300N uses a chipset called TOPDOG made by Marvell. This same chipset is in every 802.11n draft adapter implementation out there from what I can tell -- Linksys, Belkin, D-Link, etc. There might be a competing chipset, but I stopped investigating when I nailed down the source of the problems.
All these implementations use a driver made by Marvell, the manufacturer of the TOPDOG chipset. There are different versions out there, but apparently none that are OEM-specific.
CAUSE
Two manufacturers NICs experienced the same issues -- Linksys, and D-Link. I didn't try any others. Both cause disconnects (manufacturer's wifi manager managing the connection) or system hangs/crashes (XP managing the connection through WZC). The failure seems to only occur when a large number of TCP connections are being managed by the system, as well as a high rate of connection attempts to different hosts.
This sort of environment is exactly what happens in P2P applications. Most common are bittorrent clients, and on-line gaming.
I could blow out the WUSB300N within a minute or two by firing up Azureus (bitorrent), with a lot of seeding torrents (60).
Problem #1 is the Linksys WUSB300N implementation. It's flaky hardware. I had two, and both behaved exactly the same on my WinXP machine with the latest driver available from Linksys (v1.0.1.7, IIRC).
The DWA-142 Wireless N USB adapter from D-Link performed much better regardless of the driver. The Marvell driver installed from the CD was version 1.0.1.2; Both NICs worked with this driver, and average throughput was about 25% faster than with v1.0.1.7 shipped with the WUSB300N. As noted, WUSB300N died within a minute or two of cranking up the connections and connrate. D-Link ran for as long as 2 hours without a problem, then same failure mode.
This was true with all three Marvell driver versions I had: 1.0.1.7 from Linksys, 1.0.1.2 from D-Link, and one other, 1.0.5.5 that came from a Microsoft optional update. Again, both mfg adapters worked with all these drivers, all failed in the same way, D-Link was massively more stable (and a little faster) than Linksys.
THE SOLUTION
Marvell apparently has fixed these problems in their latest driver. It is version 1.0.6.4. The only place I could find it was on the D-Link website, in the support section, available as a beta download for the DWA-142. Unfortunately, this is a package (v1.2) that includes all the D-Link custom monitor apps and other crapola, and the driver files (inf, sys, cat) are buried in a cab file, so it's not easy to install just the driver. You have to install the package. However, once installed, I was configured and running in no time, and started testing.
Solid as a rock.
Fast.
No disconnects or crashes (yet). Fired up Azureus 2 hours ago, started a large file copy (24GB) between the two wireless PCs, and am connected to the suspect machine via Remote Desktop from where I'm writing this post. No problem in sight (fingers crossed!)
Since I don't have a WUSB300N any more, I can't test drive v1.0.6.4 with it. Someone who has one should. I'd be shocked if it didn't work (i.e. function), and very well may solve the disconnect/crash problems for this NIC too.
Also, those of you with the WUSB300N should be pounding on Linksys to get this driver out the door ASAP. Why don't they have a beta release like D-Link? D-Link seems to be more interested in their customer's satisfaction, for some reason.
Anyway, that's what I've found. Hope it helps. I love my Linksys router -- I have a similar story to this on the router front with Linksys in the winners circle, and Netgear -- my prior networking solution for 10 years -- on the scrapheap.
So, now I have a mixed mfg network... Linksys WRT300N router, awesome and rock solid, two D-Link NICs on the PCs. Everything seems to running as it should.
I'll post again tomorrow after this setup has had 24 hours to run, and let you all know how it comes out. Looking pretty good at the moment!
Message Edited by dwallersv on
10-17-2007 01:44 PM